A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving potential neighbours over the construction of the wall in a coastal website in a very north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted nationwide attention adhering to an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed household dwelling at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of setting up breaches, environmental concerns, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Periods posting about René Collier and also the Irish Instances report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced into a hugely publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building operates at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, look for to build their loved ones residence. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where development pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of recognized citizens. According to the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying created by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted underneath organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each people of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries of their web-site, leading to an encroachment over a Unique Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, therefore locations are subject matter to stringent controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have lasting ecological repercussions, particularly within a delicate coastal environment for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their organizing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partially constructed, is in the right situation. Their lawful workforce has characterised the motion being an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their check out, an allegation that's been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal planning disputes, exactly where views of the sea are both extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic endeavours via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, In keeping with sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded via waist-high h2o all through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods, an image that has considering the fact that develop into emblematic on the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Obtain Visible evidence of your wall’s placement relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Moments noted, describing how The 2 Males entered the h2o in the course of severe weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become Probably the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely famous that this kind of actions ended up cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being lined intimately by the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become greatly searched phrases as audience sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court listened to even further submissions on whether or not interim orders needs to be granted to halt building pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital moment while in the lawful timeline.
For the Main of the dispute is really a disagreement above boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain which the wall, as built, goes past what was authorized and intrudes into protected land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, continues to be described as meticulous in his examination of scheduling paperwork, maps, and situations attached into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their motion is inspired by concern for environmental defense and adherence to setting up law. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting in its place that it is about making sure that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got described their prolonged-standing connection to the world as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair just trying to make a family members dwelling in accordance Together with the law. They deny the wall encroaches on a Exclusive Region of Conservation and say that each one works are actually carried out based upon Skilled advice and accepted designs. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including entering the sea through a storm, do not change the underlying facts.
The case has also raised broader questions on how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute over construction of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description to get a circumstance that lots of observers see as significantly popular. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Moments write-up about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Earlier been associated with nearby advocacy on planning and environmental challenges, while not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from very unique Skilled backgrounds can discover by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, became synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of midsection-large h2o during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Times and René Collier waded by means of midsection-higher drinking water through a storm to photograph the website René Collier Irish Situations are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting both equally the Actual physical reality in the coastline as well as symbolic nature from the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings carry on, the outcome remains uncertain. The court need to establish whether the wall as developed complies with organizing permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Particular Location of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and preparing situations. However the human element continues to be central: neighbours who will have to Are living together with each other lengthy once the authorized expenses have been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of construction operates at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, although the implications of the case increase over and above that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. Additionally, it underscores how immediately a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns which include environmental safety and residence legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a spot of pure elegance and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre of the dispute stands partially designed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal queries. Irrespective of whether it'll eventually be altered, eradicated, or completed as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s results. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will most likely proceed to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to The most carefully watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.